Suzanne Gordon |
Meghan found some pretty good information on the Veteran's Healthcare Administration's website that outlined a lot of the positives and other additional information. She mentions that the volume of information could pose a problem and I can agree with this. Approaching a topic you're unfamiliar with and being overloaded with information could be damaging to someone's view because they could give up just from being overwhelmed. She was also able to find non-government supporters, such as author Suzanne Gordon. Some of the issues she's run across include the amount of outdated information out there versus the amount of current information out there and I feel this could be a problem with many topics but especially something government-related like hers. Many of her resources could fall into multiple rhetorical appeals. She's also found some blogs to help support her message as well as some non-profit organizations. Several of the opinions could be logical and fact-based, using logic and reason to make the persuasive appeal (logos), while pathos uses the emotional appeal to persuade anyone that's been close to a Veteran and witnessed their healthcare struggles first hand. Finally, some of these sources use ethos to make persuasive appeals based on credibility such as from the Veteran's Health Care Administration website or from a published author, Suzanne Gordon. I could see this topic having a lot of potentially opposing views as many political topics seem to have.
destinationlancasterca.org |
Jenna's research mostly turned up positive and supportive POVs, because it's not common to find someone that is against pedestrian safety - just unawareness of the topic. She was able to find some University web presences to support her message which is basically perfect since her topic is not only on pedestrian safety but pedestrian safety at WVU. She was also able to find some government based web presences - adding ethos and credibility to the resources. Pedestrian safety is a logical subject and bound to be surrounded by logos rhetorical appeals. In addition to finding web presences that shared her POV, she found some that shared the aesthetic she wanted to use. I like that she was able to incorporate news articles that can add to the credibility of her message as well as the emotional appeal because of the very real information presented and possibly the emotional outcome of the unsafe pedestrian environments. The main takeaway I've gathered from Jenna's research is that more information does not always equal the best.
self.com |
Vincent was able to find what seems like an abundance of both supportive and opposing POVs. I can see this as being another topic that could have a lot of arguments about its usefulness, legitimacy, etc. It seems that one of the most common presence he was able to find were web pages attempting to sell a product to consumers. He noticed the common theme of a common color scheme. Most of the opposing POVs were scientific and fact-based web presences which is to be expected with his topic. I don't know that there would be much logos in this topic although if presented well it's possible. I really admire that even though Vincent found a website that did not agree with his POV, he wanted to emulate some of the features. The main takeaway from Vincent's research is that he wants to take the middle road, which I also want to do with my presence. There are good and back, positive and negatives to most topics and POVs and I feel it adds credibility to the presenter.
comhs.org |
I absolutely love Lakynn's topic. I nearly chose this topic for my own but I covered it in a previous English course and found it difficult to find the information I wanted to convey because it was a little more focused on one or two mental health disorders. I'm unsure if it was intentional or a coincidence, but Lakynn's overall blog matches many color schemes for mental health awareness campaigns. Similarly to Jenna's research, there are not many people that oppose Lakynn's topic. In my experience, most of the opinions that "disagree" are usually people or organizations that do not feel mental health can affect someone significantly or that it's truly a disorder or disabling to some people. She was able to find many social media accounts supporting her POV, and this can be a great thing since more and more people are using social media as an outlet to discuss and advocate for their causes, such as she points out that celebrities frequently use social media for this purpose. I noticed some of the other web presences she found included personal blogs with stories of their experiences and I find this can be very persuasive with the emotional appeal of pathos.
From my classmate's research, I've learned a lot about frequent color schemes associated with certain topics and I'm on the fence if I would want to conform in my DCP to the frequent color schemes I've found across some web presences related to my topic. I've been reminded that this could be seen as a museum-curated piece and should flow as such. My classmates have evolved their thinking about how they want their DCP to look and I still feel like I'm struggling with the overall flow and movement of mine and how I want to structure it. Many of the elements they've mentioned including has provided me inspiration that I hope to learn from and create something that works for my topic and DCP.